Example team · Fictional people and results, shown on the real Library screens. The two papers and the checks of them are real. What am I looking at?

Berry Science Library

← Quantum Science in Space

Shared in Quantum Science in Space · Result

A 0.9 ms magnetic lens slows the cloud's expansion about seven-fold

Authors
Jonas Weber, Example Institute for Space Quantum Science (fictional)
Contributors
Claude Code · Opus 5.5 · Berry Science agent skills

Published 2026-10-05 · Last reviewed 2026-10-06 · Reviewed · 1 candidate issue

Re-trapping the condensate for 0.9 ms, 20 ms after release (a magnetic lens), lowers its expansion energy from 506 ± 21 pK to 67 ± 10 pK, so that after 300 ms of free fall the cloud is 38 µm instead of 70 µm wide (rms).

Corrected

Transcription error, thanks Lena. The fit output is right; the statement is corrected below.

The expansion energy with the lens is 76 ± 10 pK, as in the fit output. The seven-fold reduction in the title stands.

Corrected to

Re-trapping the condensate for 0.9 ms, 20 ms after release (a magnetic lens), lowers its expansion energy from 506 ± 21 pK to 76 ± 10 pK, so that after 300 ms of free fall the cloud is 38 µm instead of 70 µm wide (rms).

by the author, 2026-10-06

Holds when: Condensate as in [1]; lens timing from the model of [2]; widths from Gaussian fits along x.

Figure 1. Absorption images of the cloud 50, 150 and 300 ms after release. Top: without the lens it spreads and fades. Bottom: after the 0.9 ms lens it stays compact.

Conventions

units.lab v1
Lengths in mm or µm, times in ms or s, accelerations in mm/s²; z points away from the chip surface. Expansion energies as k_B·T in pK, with k_B T = m σ_v². · units

Evidence

  1. Evidence 1 · Reasoning · markdown

    A cloud's width grows as σ(t)² = σ₀² + σ_v² t² once it falls freely, so the slope at long times measures the velocity spread σ_v, and with it the expansion energy k_B T = m σ_v². The lens duration was set to the minimum the model of [2] predicts (0.88 ms), rounded to the 0.1 ms the sequencer allows.

  2. Figure 2. The rms width against time of flight, with the fits that give the expansion energies.
  3. Evidence 2 · Code · python

    import numpy as npfrom scipy.optimize import curve_fitKB, M = 1.380649e-23, 86.909180 * 1.66053906660e-27def width(t, s0, sv):          # rms width (m) after time-of-flight t (s)    return np.sqrt(s0**2 + (sv*t)**2)def expansion_energy(tof, sigma):    p, cov = curve_fit(width, tof, sigma, p0=[20e-6, 1e-4])    sv, dsv = p[1], np.sqrt(cov[1, 1])    e = M*sv**2/KB * 1e12                    # pK    return e, 2*e*dsv/svdata = np.loadtxt("run-1005-lens/widths.csv", delimiter=",", skiprows=1)tof, plain, lensed = data[:, 0]*1e-3, data[:, 1]*1e-6, data[:, 2]*1e-6for name, s in (("no lens", plain), ("lens 0.9 ms", lensed)):    e, de = expansion_energy(tof, s)    print(f"{name:12s} E = {e:.0f} ± {de:.0f} pK")
  4. Evidence 3 · Output

    What the fit printed.

    no lens      E = 506 ± 21 pK
    lens 0.9 ms  E = 76 ± 10 pK
  5. Evidence 4 · Data · csv

    The fitted widths, as measured.

    tof_ms,sigma_plain_um,sigma_lensed_um
    20,22.0,29.4
    50,24.5,28.5
    80,27.8,29.0
    110,32.8,28.6
    140,39.4,29.3
    170,43.0,33.4
    200,49.0,35.2
    240,61.3,35.8
    270,60.3,36.3
    300,69.1,37.0

Provenance

recorded_by
Berry Science agent skills · record-claim
code
ran exactly as shown (confirmed by the author)
anchors
run:2026-10-05-lens, dataset:widths.csv

References

  1. [1]

    A Bose–Einstein condensate of 1.2 × 10⁵ rubidium atoms on the chip · in this Library · uses

    The condensate the lens acts on.

  2. [2]

    A model of the cloud after release: the residual magnetic push and the best lens duration · in this Library · uses

    The lens duration that minimises the expansion energy.

Cited by

Review reports

Review report · by Lena Hartmann

2026-10-06

Candidate issues, not verified.

Read the statement against the fit output and the figures. One number does not match.

  1. 1Moderateconfirmed

    The statement gives 67 ± 10 pK for the lensed cloud, but the fit output (Evidence 3) prints 76 ± 10 pK — the digits look swapped. The title's "about seven-fold" matches the output (506/76 ≈ 6.7), not the statement. Anything that builds on this number inherits the error.

    points at: Statement

    “67 ± 10 pK”

    Proposed fix

    76 ± 10 pK

    numerical · internal_inconsistency

Cite this claim

Jonas Weber (2026). A 0.9 ms magnetic lens slows the cloud's expansion about seven-fold. Berry Science Library. 46135936-a865-5a9f-a8b2-f9ec608fb7eb