Example team · Fictional people and results, shown on the real Library screens. The two papers and the checks of them are real. What am I looking at?

Berry Science Library

← Quantum Science in Space

Shared in Quantum Science in Space · Result

One lens is not enough for a 10⁻¹⁵ test of free fall in space; two would be

Authors
Mira Okafor, Example Institute for Space Quantum Science (fictional)
Contributors
Claude Code · Opus 5.5 · Berry Science agent skills

Published 2026-10-11 · Last reviewed 2026-10-12 · Reviewed · 1 candidate issue

The 76 pK reached with one lens [1] is above the 50 pK that a satellite test of the universality of free fall at the 10⁻¹⁵ level requires [2]. Simulating a second, weaker lens 40 ms after the first predicts 31 ± 5 pK, below the requirement.

Holds when: The thin-lens model of [3] holds for the second pulse; the residual field in orbit is the one measured on ground.

Figure 1. Expansion energy without a lens, with one (measured, [1]) and with two (simulated), against the 50 pK a 10⁻¹⁵ test requires [2]. Log scale.

Conventions

units.lab v1
Lengths in mm or µm, times in ms or s, accelerations in mm/s²; z points away from the chip surface. Expansion energies as k_B·T in pK, with k_B T = m σ_v². · units

Evidence

  1. Evidence 1 · Reasoning · markdown

    The requirement comes from Tab. I of [2], which lists 50 pK for η = 10⁻¹⁵ and 10 pK for 10⁻¹⁷. The table was checked before use (see the review of [2]): its expansion velocities follow from these energies. The second lens is modelled with the thin-lens formula of [3], acting on the larger, slower cloud the first lens leaves behind. The input is the corrected value of [1], 76 ± 10 pK; the first version of that claim said 67 ± 10 pK.

  2. Evidence 2 · Code · python

    import numpy as npKB, AMU = 1.380649e-23, 1.66053906660e-27REQUIREMENT_PK = 50          # eta = 1e-15, Tab. I of arXiv:2310.04212def second_lens(e_after_first, tau, tau_star, floor):    """Thin-lens model of claim [3], applied to the cloud the first lens    left behind: a weaker pulse, fired 40 ms later."""    return floor + (e_after_first - floor) * (1 - tau/tau_star)**2E1, dE1 = 76.0, 10.0          # pK, one lens (claim [1], as corrected)tau_star2 = 3.4e-3           # 40 ms of expansion in a 12.2 Hz pulsetau2 = 2.55e-3               # the longest pulse the coil driver allowsrng = np.random.default_rng(1011)e1 = rng.normal(E1, dE1, 20000)floor2 = rng.normal(28.0, 5.0, 20000)   # pK, the larger cloud's size floore2 = second_lens(e1, tau2, tau_star2, floor2)print(f"two lenses: {e2.mean():.0f} ± {e2.std():.0f} pK "      f"(requirement {REQUIREMENT_PK} pK)")
  3. Evidence 3 · Output

    two lenses: 31 ± 5 pK (requirement 50 pK)

Provenance

recorded_by
Berry Science agent skills · record-claim
source_check
review-source on arXiv:2310.04212, Tab. I, before use
anchors
code:two_lenses.py@a91e4b2

References

  1. [1]

    A 0.9 ms magnetic lens slows the cloud's expansion about seven-fold · in this Library · uses

    The energy one lens reaches, as corrected.

  2. [2]

    Struckmann et al., Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of the Weak Equivalence Principle (2023) arxiv:2310.04212 · Tab. I · uses

    The expansion-energy requirement of a 10⁻¹⁵ test.

    1 review of this paper · Cited passage: Holds

  3. [3]

    A model of the cloud after release: the residual magnetic push and the best lens duration · in this Library · extends

    The thin-lens model, applied a second time.

Review reports

Review report · by Lena Hartmann

2026-10-12

Candidate issues, not verified.

The argument is sound and the requirement is cited to a checked table. One assumption needs a run before this goes into the mission proposal.

  1. 1Moderate

    The simulation keeps the residual push measured on ground. In orbit there is no gravitational sag, so the cloud sits about 30 µm higher in the lens and sees a different field. One run with the cloud displaced would settle whether the margin survives.

    points at: Holds when

    methodological

Cite this claim

Mira Okafor (2026). One lens is not enough for a 10⁻¹⁵ test of free fall in space; two would be. Berry Science Library. 548236e3-84e9-5e7c-b3a7-471b21e8dfdd